Standardized assessment methods for assessing the quality of life of children and adolescents

Reading time less than 1 minute

This page contains 1 evidence gap

Standardized assessment methods for assessing the quality of life of children and adolescents

Population:: Children, adolescents and young adults until 21 years of age
Index test:: Standardized assessment methods for assessing the quality of life of children and adolescents
Comparison:: Only applicable for the evaluation of criterion validity
Outcomes:: Psychometric properties, validity, and reliability

What evidence is needed?

A systematic review is needed.

What evidence is available?

Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

None identified

Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

None identified

Information from: SBU. Standardiserade bedömningsmetoder i utredningar av barn och unga inom socialtjänsten [Standardised assessment tools in investigations of children and adolescents within the child protection service]. Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärdering (SBU); 2022. SBU Bereder 344. More about the report

Registration number:: SBU 2022/711
Published:: 2022-10-17

Research conducted after publication could potentially change the nature of the evidence.

To top

Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.